Appeal No. 1999-2286 Page 7
Application No. 08/352,660
have suggested the limitations of "allowing said first
subsystem to transmit said request and data substantially
simultaneously, said request being transmitted during said
transmission of said data" or "said first subsystem
transmitting a request and data substantially simultaneously,
said request being transmitted during said transmission of
said data.” Therefore, we reverse the rejection of claims 1-7
and 9 as being obvious over Nakada in view of Craft and of
claim 10 as being obvious over Nakada in view of Craft further
in view of May.
CONCLUSION
In summary, the rejection of claims 1-7, 9, and 10 under
§ 103 is reversed.
REVERSED
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007