The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 43 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte THOMAS L. MCLAUGHLIN and CAROL A. CALDWELL __________ Appeal No. 1999-2630 Application 08/341,464 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before PATE, MCQUADE, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges. MCQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Thomas L. McLaughlin et al. originally took this appeal from the final rejection of claims 6, 9, 10, 13 and 14. The appellants have since canceled claims 10, 13 and 14, and added claims 15 and 16 which were allowed by the examiner (see the advisory action dated April 17, 1997, Paper No. 26). Thus, the appeal now involves claims 6 and 9. Claims 1 through 5, the 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007