Appeal No. 1999-2630 Application 08/341,464 II. The 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection Panza, the examiner’s primary reference, discloses a composite adhesive tape 11 (see Figures 1 and 2) for connecting opposing edges 30, 35 of a diaper (see Figures 3 through 5). The tape includes bonded and fastening sections 16 and 17 defined by a fastening tape 12, a target tape 18, a release tape 21 and a unifying strip 24. The composite tape also includes a first fingerlift strip 20 positioned between and extending outwardly of the fastening tape and the target tape for facilitating separation of the fastening tape from the target tape, and a second fingerlift strip 23 attached to and extending outwardly of the target tape for facilitating separation of the target tape from the release tape. The appellants have not disputed the examiner’s determination (see page 6 in the answer) that Panza responds to all of the limitations in claim 6 except for those relating to the printed adhesive-inhibiting masking means. Imsande discloses a tacky floor mat for use in hospitals, industrial clean areas and like applications to remove loose particles of dirt, dust and soil from shoes, wheels, etc. The mat 10 consists of a stack 12 of adhered, peelable sheets 14, 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007