Ex parte MCLAUGHLIN et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1999-2630                                                        
          Application 08/341,464                                                      


         inhibiting adherence of the adhesive face, said outer end of                 
         said substrate means having an outermost part, said printed                  
         masking means being provided on the adhesive face at said                    
         outermost part of said outer end, said printed masking means                 
         being in contact with said release face, said printed masking                
         means extending across said width of said tape whereby said                  
         printed masking means is cut from a printed masking means                    
         continuum extending along the length of said fastener tape                   
         stock, said printed masking means                                            
         being peelable and liftable from said release face along with                
         said adhesive face for easy-start initiation of said peeling                 
         from said one part of the diaper, and said printed masking                   
         means being thereafter reusable both (1) to open said user                   
         joint and (2) to subsequently reopen said user joint after                   
         refastening thereof.                                                         
                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
              Claims 6 and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first              
         paragraph, as being based on a specification lacking original                
         support for the invention now claimed.                                       
              Claims 6 and 9 also stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                    
         103(a) as being unpatentable over U.S. Patent No. 4,801,480 to               
         Panza et al. (Panza) in view of U.S. Patent No. 4,107,811 to                 
         Imsande and U.S. Patent No. 3,874,893 to Cherrin.                            
              Reference is made to the appellants’ main, reply and                    
         supplemental reply briefs (Paper Nos. 29, 35 and 41) and to the              
         examiner’s answer (Paper No. 40) for the respective positions                
         of the appellants and the examiner with regard to the merits of              
         these rejections.                                                            
                                          3                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007