VISSER et al v. HOFVANDER et al - Page 82




          Interference 103,579                                                        
          genomic DNA, we find that full length PGBSS cDNA is not itself a            
          genomic DNA fragment.  None of Hofvander’s claims define or                 
          otherwise describe full length PGBSS cDNA or a DNA sequence                 
          copied from an mRNA transcript of the PGBSS gene which is                   
          complementary to full length PGBSS genomic DNA.                             
               Next, we repeat our previous conclusion that the “gene                 
          construct comprising a fragment of the potato gene which codes              
          [or coding] for [formation of] granule-bound starch synthase                
          [(GBSS) . . .] inserted in the anti-sense direction . . .                   
          selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 2            
          and SEQ ID No. 3" (Hofvander’s Claims 1, 7, 10 and 50) does not             
          read on, and is not encompassed by claims directed to, a gene               
          construct comprising a fragment of the potato gene coding for               
          GBSS inserted in the anti-sense direction selected from the group           
          consisting of SEQ ID No. 1, SEQ ID No. 2 and SEQ ID No. 3 as a              
          subfragment of a larger fragment of the potato gene coding for              
          GBSS inserted in the antisense direction.  Accordingly, we find             
          that the constructs Hofvander claims comprising a fragment of a             
          full length genomic DNA sequence inserted in the antisense                  
          direction is not encompassed by, and most certainly does not                
          anticipate, the constructs Visser claims comprising a full length           
          genomic DNA sequence inserted in the antisense direction.  As we            
          interpret the subject matter the parties to this interference               
          claim, inserts comprising a DNA fragment of a DNA segment of the            
                                        -82-                                          





Page:  Previous  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007