Ex parte HAYAMI - Page 7




          Appeal No. 2000-0424                                                        
          Application 08/760,510                                                      

          to said . . . conductor[]."  The blind hole 48 a "blind                     
          through hole[] (BTH[]) respectively connected to said . . .                 
          wiring[]" by the plating layer 49.  The conductor layer 34 is               
          a "lead," "said lead forming an intermediate layer of said                  
          laminate printed circuit board located below said plated                    
          conductors, connected to said . . . BTH[], and extending in a               
          direction different from said first direction, . . . wherein                
          said lead extends toward a second edge of the printed circuit               
          board," because it can be seen that the conductor layer 34                  
          must extend in a direction in and out of the plane of the                   
          paper in order to connect to anything.                                      
               The Examiner states (FR4-5; EA3):                                      
                    Yasuda discloses the claimed invention except                     
               multiple ones of the conductor, BTH, wirings and the                   
               holes, because he does not show the entire board.  It                  
               would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the                
               art, a[t] the time the invention was made, to repeat the               
               pattern shown in figure 6 of Yasuda to make a complete                 
               board, thereby yielding a plurality of conductors, holes,              
               BTHs and wirings, because repeating a known pattern on a               
               circuit board for increased capacity is [sic, was] well                
               known in the electrical arts.                                          
               We think what the Examiner intended is that the                        
          arrangement of Fig. 6 shows one plated conductor/wiring/BTH                 
          pattern, which is equivalent to a cross-section along the axis              
          of one of the terminals 21 and BTHs 10 in Appellant's Fig. 3A.              
                                        - 7 -                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007