Appeal No. 2000-0424
Application 08/760,510
The Examiner again fails to show a lead that is used for
plating (or capable of being used for plating) a plurality of
conductors that is then severed by holes which disconnect the
plurality of conductors. We conclude that the Examiner has
failed to establish a prima facie case of obviousness as to
claim 8. The rejection of claim 8 is, therefore, reversed.
- 13 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007