Appeal No. 2000-0431 Page 18 Application No. 08/789,127 (Fed. Cir. 1989)). Here, representative claim 11 specifies in1 pertinent part the following limitations: setting means for setting a region where said moving apparatus moves; input means for inputting a position where said moving apparatus completes movement in said set region; and operation means for determining the prescribed pitch employed by said running control means based on the region set by said setting means and the position input by said input means. The appellants’ specification states that “[t]he distance between a forward path and a backward path in zigzag running is herein referred to as ‘a traverse movement pitch.’” (Spec. at 19.) Giving the claim its broadest reasonable interpretation, the limitations merely require inter alia determining a distance 1“The PTO broadly interprets claims during examination of a patent application since the applicant may ‘amend his claims to obtain protection commensurate with his actual contribution to the art.’” In re Yamamoto, 740 F.2d 1569, 1571, 222 USPQ 934, 936 (Fed. Cir. 1984)(quoting In re Prater, 415 F.2d 1393,Page: Previous 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007