Appeal No. 2000-1961 Application 08/840,200 this is not so. Claim 16 does not preclude baseline data from being measured "on-line" and stored for later comparison with test data measured "on-line" at a later time. We find this measurement of baseline data from the working check valve assembly meets the limitation of "determining, on-line, a time- based baseline data set for said operating characteristic representative of a normal sequence of on-line operations of said control mechanism." Appellants' arguments that "[t]he baseline [in Hill] is not changed during the on-line operation of the valve" (Br5) and "[n]o provision is illustrated or described in the Hill disclosure for modifying the value of the baseline parameters loaded into the CPU RAM" (Br6) are not commensurate in scope with the claim because claim 16 says nothing about the baseline changing after it has been determined. Thus, we find that the rejection of claim 16 over Hill has not been shown to be in error. The rejection of claim 16 over Hill is sustained. Hale teaches establishing baseline running conditions, baseline running conditions being defined as near to normal, non-degraded running conditions as possible for the valve (claim 1). The baseline condition is to be similar to the normal conditions at which the motor operated valve (MOV) operates during valve-in-use trending (col. 4, lines 38-40). This indicates that if valve-in-use trending values are taken under dynamic ("on-line") conditions, baseline measurements are also - 9 -Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007