Appeal No. 2000-2001
Application No. 09/172,732
heat spreader, however, the prior art has not suggested the
recited application of ZnCr layer being used as an adhesive
between the heat spreader and the substrate. Therefore, we are
not convinced by the Examiner’s arguments.
Since this recited feature appears in all the claims on
appeal, we do not sustain the obviousness rejection of claims
1-21 over Miyamoto and the admitted prior art.
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007