Appeal No. 2000-2258 Application No. 08/888,759 In conclusion, since the Examiner has not established a prima facie case of obviousness, the 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of independent claim 5, as well as claims 2-4 and 6-8 dependent thereon, is not sustained. Therefore, the decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 2-8 is reversed. REVERSED JERRY SMITH ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) STUART S. LEVY ) Administrative Patent Judge ) JFR/lp 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007