Ex Parte EGITTO et al - Page 7


              Appeal No. 2001-0106                                                                                     
              Application 08/855,811                                                                                   
                     …neither Pluddeman [sic] nor Hahn et al teach or suggest a coupling agent                         
                     interposed between a conductive adhesive and a substrate.                                         
                     The Examiner on the other hand states on page 5, lines 6-12 of the Examiner’s                     
              Answer, that:                                                                                            
                     Regarding both of the foregoing art rejections, the (conventional) polymeric                      
                     materials disclosed in/employed by the three applied references are held/seen to                  
                     (a) encompass within their scope and definition filled and/or conductive polymers                 
                     i.e. those polymeric materials composed of a known base resin in conjunction                      
                     with an (e.g. carbon, metal etc., conductive) filler; and (b) possess adhesive                    
                     properties/functionality/capability in at least some instances.                                   
                     After a searching review of Thomson, Pleuddemann, and Hahn, we are                                
              constrained to agree with the Appellants’ interpretation of the references.  First, we are               
              unable to discern any teaching of an electrically conductive adhesive within the four                    
              corners of the Thomson document.    Second, we cannot find a layer of coupling agent                     
              between an electrically conductive adhesive and a metal substrate in either                              
              Pleuddemann or Hahn.  Although the scope of the Thomson, Pleuddemann and Hahn                            
              reference may indeed be generic to a conductive adhesive (“any polymer”, Thomson,                        
              Col. 1, lines 18-19; “epoxy resins”, Pleuddemann, Col. 3, lines 18-19; and “numerous                     
              polymeric systems” Hahn Col. 3, line 48), that is simply not an express or implied                       
              disclosure of a conductive adhesive.  It appears that Hahn even suggests the opposite -                  
              that the polymers be used as  “insulating and planarization layers for multilayer                        
              electronic devices” (Column 3, lines 57-58).                                                             
                     Anticipation under 35 U.S.C. Section 102(e) requires that "each and every                         
              element as set forth in the claim is found, either expressly or inherently described, in a               
              single prior art reference."  Verdegaal Bros., Inc. v. Union Oil Co., 814 F.2d 628, 631, 2               
              USPQ2d 1051, 1053 (Fed. Cir. 1987).    As this standard has not been met for the §102                    


                                                          7                                                            



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007