The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 38
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte YUKIO MAKI
_____________
Appeal No. 2001-1523
Application No. 08/731,236
______________
HEARD: May 8, 2002
_______________
Before HAIRSTON, LALL, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges
LALL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL1
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the Examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 16 and 18
through 24, all the pending claims in the application.
1Appellant points out on page 1 of the reply brief that the examiner has
not acknowledged the IDS of August 13, 1998. We will leave this issue to the
examiner, it being a procedural issue. Therefore, any applicable art
contained therein is not before us in this appeal.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007