The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CHRISTOPH OSTER and MARTIN WAGNER
____________
Appeal No. 2001-2045
Application No. 09/360,936
____________
ON BRIEF1
____________
Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection (Paper No. 12,
mailed August 10, 2000) of claims 21 to 23, 31, 36 and 38.2 Claim 34, the only other
claim pending in this application, depends from canceled claim 32 and has not been
1 On October 2, 2002, the appellants waived the oral hearing (see Paper No. 22) scheduled for
October 22, 2002.
2 Claims 24 to 30, 32, 33, 35 and 37 were canceled subsequent to the final rejection.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007