Ex Parte OSTER et al - Page 7




              Appeal No. 2001-2045                                                                  Page 7                
              Application No. 09/360,936                                                                                  


              Figures 1-15 illustrate the details of an elastomeric rocker switch assembly 10, in                         
              combination with a radio frequency transmitting circuit 33.  Elastomeric rocker switch                      
              assembly 10 has three basic parts: a switch pad 11; a base plate 25; and an electrical                      
              switch support shown as printed circuit board 29.                                                           


                     Switch pad 11 has three components which are integrally attached together,                           
              preferably molded as a single piece from an elastomeric material.  The three                                
              components are (1) a switch pad base member 12, (2) one or more rocker switch                               
              blocks 13, and (3) thin web connectors 14.  Each switch block 13 is suspended within                        
              base member 12 by two thin elastomeric web connectors 14.  Schooley teaches                                 
              (column 2, lines 8-11; column 3, lines 39-40) that advantageously, the switch pad base                      
              member 12, rocker switch blocks 13 and thin web connectors 14 are all integrally                            
              molded from an elastomeric material such as rubber, rubberized plastic or Teflon®.                          


              The examiner's position                                                                                     
                     In the rejection of claim 21 before us in this appeal (answer, pp. 3-4), the                         
              examiner (1) ascertained8 that Yamamoto "discloses all of the claimed limitations with                      


                     8 After the scope and content of the prior art are determined, the differences between the prior     
              art and the claims at issue are to be ascertained.  Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 17-18, 148        
              USPQ 459, 467 (1966).                                                                                       







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007