Ex Parte OSTER et al - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2001-2045                                                                  Page 2                
              Application No. 09/360,936                                                                                  


              specifically treated in the either the final rejection or the examiner's answer (Paper No.                  
              17, mailed December 15, 2000).                                                                              


                     We REVERSE.                                                                                          


                                                    BACKGROUND                                                            
                     The appellants' invention relates to an electrical switch.  A copy of the claims                     
              under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the appellants' brief.                                         


                     The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                      
              appealed claims are:                                                                                        
              Schooley                                   5,508,479                    April 16, 1996                      
              Yamamoto et al. (Yamamoto)                 5,619,021                    April   8, 1997                     



                     Claims 21 to 23, 31, 36 and 38 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                         
              unpatentable over Yamamoto in view of Schooley.                                                             


                     Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and                        
              the appellants regarding the above-noted rejection, we make reference to the answer                         
              for the examiner's complete reasoning in support of the rejection, and to the brief                         







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007