Appeal No. 2002-2274 Application No. 08/387,158 rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 33, 34, 39-41, 43, 44, 46-48, 52, 55, 58 and 61 over Sakano in view of Apostolos and the appellants’ admitted prior art, and claims 35-38, 42, 45, 51, 53, 54, 56, 57, 59, 60, 62, 64 and 66 over Sakano in view of Apostolos, the appellants’ admitted prior art, and JP ‘683, JP ‘128 or JP ‘637, are reversed. The rejection of claims 63, 65 and 67 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over JP ‘683 is reversed. New grounds of rejection of claims 46, 47, 52, 55, 58, 61, 63, 65 and 67 have been entered under 37 CFR § 1.196(b). In addition to affirming the examiner’s rejection of one or more claims, this decision contains a new ground of rejection pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b), by final rule notice, 62 Fed. Reg. 53, 131, 53, 197 (Oct. 10, 1997), 1203 Off. Gaz. Pat. & Trademark Office 63, 122 (Oct. 21, 1997)). 37 CFR § 1.196(b) provides, “A new ground of rejection shall not be considered final for purposes of judicial review.” Regarding any affirmed rejection, 37 CFR § 1.197(b) provides: (b) Appellants may file a single request for rehearing within two months from the date of the original decision ... 37 CFR § 1.196(b) also provides that the appellants, WITHIN TWO MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise one of 17Page: Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007