Ex Parte NAGAOKA et al - Page 2




           Appeal No. 2003-0060                                                                     
           Application 09/236,718                                                                   


                 8.  A staple fiber non-woven fabric comprising:                                    
                 three-dimensionally entangled constituent fibers including                         
           first and second split staple fibers, the first split staple                             
           fibers formed from a polyamide, second split staple fibers formed                        
           from polyester and water absorptive staple fibers;                                       
                 wherein the first and second split staple fibers have a                            
           fineness of not greater than 0.5 denier per fiber and a splitting                        
           degree of at least 85%.                                                                  
                                         THE REFERENCES                                             
           Pike et al. (Pike)                5,759,926         Jun.  2, 1998                        
           Nakamura et al. (Nakamura)1        6-101148         Apr. 12, 1994                        
                 (Japanese kokai)                                                                   
                                          THE REJECTION                                             
                 Claims 8-13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                          
           unpatentable over Nakamura in view of Pike.                                              
                                             OPINION                                                
                 We affirm the aforementioned rejection.                                            
                 The appellants indicate that the claims stand or fall                              
           together (brief, page 3).  We therefore limit our discussion to                          
           one claim, i.e., claim 8.  See In re Ochiai, 71 F.3d 1565, 1566                          
           n.2, 37 USPQ2d 1127, 1129 n.2 (Fed. Cir. 1995); 37 CFR                                   
           § 1.192(c)(7)(1997).                                                                     



                 1 Citations herein to Nakamura are to the English                                  
           translation thereof appended to the appellants’ brief.                                   
                                                 2                                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007