Interference No. 104,649 Page No. 28 ordinary skill would have been motivated to make such a modification since doing so would produce a thinner, more compact device as suggested by Sibbald. (Paper No. 24, p. 20). It is well settled that "aprimafacie case of obviousness is established when the teachings from the prior art itself would appear to have suggested the claimed subject matter to a person of ordinary skill in the art." In re Bell, 991 F.2d 781, 783, 26 USPQ2d 1529, 1531 (Fed. Cir. 1993) (quoting In re Rinehart, 531 F.2d 1048, 1051, 189 USPQ 143, 147 (CCPA 1976)). Any incentive, reason or motivation to modify the prior art references must flow from some teaching in the art that suggests the desirability of making the modification needed to arrive at the claimed invention. In re Napier, 55 F.3d 610, 613, 34 USPQ2d 1782, 1784 (Fed Cir. 1995); In re Gorman, 933 F.2d 982, 986-87, 18 USPQ2d 1885, 1888 (Fed. Cit. 1991). ("When it is necessary to select elements of various teachings in order to form the claimed invention, we ascertain whether there is any suggestion or motivation in the prior art to make the selection made by the applicant. [Citations omitted] ...The extent to which such suggestion must be explicit in, or may be fairly inferred from, the references, is decided on the facts of each case, in light of the prior art and its relationship to the applicant's invention."). As the moving party, Zhou has the burden of proof to show that it is entitled to the relief sought in the motion. 37 CFR § 1.637(a). On the facts presented, Zhou has failed to demonstrate that Sibbald suggests replacing its prism strip 44 with the prism sheet taught by Cobb. At best, Sibbald teaches that the use of a Fresnel prism strip 44 allows for a more compact device than an embodiment that employed a single prism 24. (See, e.g., ZX 2012, Figures 2 and 3 and col. 5, lines 1-5). Thus, Sibbald already teaches the use of the prism strip and the replacement ofPage: Previous 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007