Appeal No. 1996-0212 Application No. 08/261,759 ordinary skill in this art would understand, in our view, that to produce Borisov’s triester product, a stoichiometric excess of alcohol (e.g., ethylene glycol or glycerol) should be used. In any event, some unreacted alcohol would be expected to survive the Borisov procedure, and appellants acknowledge that the phosphate ester itself is inherently hygroscopic. See the specification at page 6, lines 18-21. Therefore, it is reasonable to presume that Borisov’s fertilizer contains hygroscopic agent in amounts equivalent to those claimed by appellants. Again, we also observe that the claimed fertilizer and the prior art fertilizer are made by processes which are essentially identical. Compare In re Best, 562 F.2d 1252, 1255, 195 USPQ 430, 433 (CCPA 1977). Thus, it logically follows that the claimed and prior art compositions should be substantially chemically identical. Accordingly, we will sustain the rejection of appealed composition claim 6. Appellants contend that appealed claims 7-20 which are dependent on appealed compostion claim 6, should be given separate consideration. However, appellants’ arguments in the brief regarding these claims simply point out differences in what the claims cover. This does not satisfy the rule which 9Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007