Ex parte LUFFEL et al. - Page 11




          Appeal No. 1999-2278                                   Page 11              
          Application No. 08/641,442                                                  


          points to no showing in Wanger, and we are not aware of any                 
          teaching, of the thumb moving in a first direction to contact               
          the handle and move the handle from an unlatched position to a              
          latched position, and vice versa.  We therefore find that the               
          examiner has failed to establish a prima facie case of                      
          anticipation of claim 8 by Wanger.  Accordingly, the rejection              
          of claim 8 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) is reversed.                            































Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007