Ex Parte SHAIO et al - Page 1



           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
                     publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.           
                                                                 Paper No. 18         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     ____________                                     
                        Ex parte SAMI SHAIO and ARTHUR V. HOFF                        
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 1999-2380                                 
                              Application No. 08/575,743                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before BARRETT, GROSS, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.              
          LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                          

                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the            
          examiner's final rejection of claims 1-20, which are all of the             
          claims pending in this application.                                         

                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               Appellants’ invention relates to maintaining packet security           
          in a computer network.  An understanding of the invention can be            
          derived from a reading of exemplary claims 1, 15 and 17, which              
          are reproduced as follows:                                                  






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007