Appeal No. 2001-1064 Application No. 09/164,069 obviousness. Accordingly, the 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of independent claims 6 and 9, as well as claims 7, 8, and 10-17 dependent thereon, is not sustained.1 1 The copy of the appealed claims attached as an appendix to Appellants’ Brief is incorrect. Claims 10 and 11 are indicated as dependent on claim 9 while these claims as amended in the amendment filed February 14, 2000 (paper No. 7) indicate a dependence on claim 6. A review of pending claims 6-17 reveals that claims 10 and 11 should properly be dependent on claim 9, not claim 6. We leave this matter for Appellants and the Examiner to address accordingly. 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007