Ex Parte HANRATTY et al - Page 1



               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today was not written for publication and is not                       
               binding precedent of the Board.                                        
                                                       Paper No. 12                   
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                  ________________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                  ________________                                    
                            Ex parte MAUREEN A. HANRATTY,                             
                             DATY M. ROGERS, QIZHI HE,                                
                                 and WEI WILLIAM LEE                                  
                                  ________________                                    
                                Appeal No. 2001-1814                                  
                               Application 09/092,115                                 
                                  ________________                                    
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                  ________________                                    
          Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH, and BARRY, Administrative Patent                 
          Judges.                                                                     
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
          This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                      
          from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-4, which constitute all           
          the claims in the application.                                              
          The disclosed invention pertains to a method of                             
          integrated circuit fabrication with transistor gates having a               
          gate length less than the linewidth provided by the lithography             

                                         -1-                                          




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007