Ex Parte ARIMILLI et al - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2001-2164                                                        
          Application No. 09/024,620                                                  



               Representative independent claim 1 is reproduced as follows:           
               1.  A method of improving memory latency associated with a             
          read-type operation in a multi-processor computer system having a           
          plurality of processing units, each processing unit further                 
          having an associated cache, the method comprising the steps of:             
               a requesting processing unit issuing a message to an                   
          interconnect of the computer system, indicating that the                    
          requesting processing unit desires to read a value from an                  
          address of a memory device of the computer system;                          
               each cache snooping the interconnect to detect the message;            
               each cache transmitting a response to the message, wherein a           
          tagged intervention response is transmitted from a responding               
          cache to indicate (i) that the responding cache contains a                  
          modified value corresponding to the address of the memory device            
          that has not been written to the memory device, (ii) that the               
          responding cache shares the modified value with at least one                
          other cache of an adjacent processing unit, and (iii) that the              
          responding cache will exclusively source the value;                         
               associating a priority with each response from each cache;             
               detecting each response and its associated priority; and               
               forwarding a response with a highest priority to the                   
          requesting processing unit.                                                 

               The examiner relies on the following references:                       
          Wilson, Jr. et al. (Wilson)    4,755,930        Jul. 5, 1988                
          Singh et al. (Singh)           5,903,908        May 11, 1999                
          (filed Oct. 15, 1996)                                                       
               Claims 1-20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                    
          unpatentable over Singh and Wilson.                                         

                                         -3–                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007