Ex Parte KIM - Page 3




              Appeal No. 2001-2579                                                                  Page 3                 
              Application No. 08/885,996                                                                                   


                     A further understanding of the invention can be achieved by reading the following                     
              claims.                                                                                                      
                            1. A method of processing print data of a printing system having a                             
                     host and a printer which are connected to each other by a bidirectional                               
                     communication interface, said method comprising the steps of:                                         
                            storing a single print driver in said host;                                                    
                            confirming a data processing form of said printer;                                             
                            generating print data corresponding to the confirmed data                                      
                     processing form of said printer; and                                                                  
                            transmitting said print data to said printer by means of said single                           
                     print driver of said host.                                                                            

                            3. A method of processing print data as set forth in claim 2, said                             
                     data processing form comprising one of a byte form, a word form, and a                                
                     long word form, and if said data processing form comprises said word                                  
                     form, then said data processing form comprises one of a high order type                               
                     and a low order type.                                                                                 


                     Claims 1, 2, and 4 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over U.S.                       
              Patent No. 5,228,118 (“Sasaki”) and U.S. Patent No. 5,625,757 (“Kageyama”).  Claim 3                         
              stands rejected under § 103(a) as obvious over Sasaki, Kageyama, and the appellant‘s                         
              admitted prior art (“AAPA”).  Claims 5 and 6 stand rejected under § 103(a) as obvious                        
              over Sasaki, Kageyama, and U.S. Patent No. 5,633,992 (“Gyllenskog").  Claims 7-9                             
              stand rejected under § 103(a) as obvious over Sasaki, Kageyama, Gyllenskog, and                              
              AAPA.                                                                                                        








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007