Ex Parte KIM - Page 6




              Appeal No. 2001-2579                                                                  Page 6                 
              Application No. 08/885,996                                                                                   


              [and] a data processing device in the form of a personal computer PC which provides                          
              the laser printer LP with the print data. . . ."  Col. 5, ll. 9-14.  The PC includes "a hard                 
              disk drive (HDD) 44. . . ."  Col. 6, ll. 43-44.  Although the PC can store multiple disk                     
              drivers on its HDD, we find that it may also store one disk driver thereon.  Specifically,                   
              "[i]f the hard disk stores only one print driver, . . . the control flow goes to step S20 in                 
              which this single print driver is read out from the hard disk and stored in the RAM 50. . .                  
              ."  Col. 7, ll. 59-63 (emphases added).  Using the stored print driver, "the personal                        
              computer PC sends to the laser printer LP via the selected print driver, a batch of print                    
              data representative of the desired printing job to be performed by the laser printer LP."                    
              Col. 8, ll. 11-16.  Because Sasaki discloses storing a print driver in a host computer, the                  
              teachings of Kageyama are merely cumulative regarding the limitation.                                        


                     Second, the examiner asserts, "[a]pplicant does not specify what a data                               
              processing form is, recited in claim 1, and Sasaki is cited to teach confirmation of a data                  
              processing form (e.g., a different language form) of a printer (col. 7, lines 34-49 taught                   
              by Sasaki)."  (Examiner's Answer at 8.)  The appellant argues, "[n]either the definition of                  
              Postscript nor PCL is equivalent to the data processing form defined in the                                  
              specification, i.e., a byte form, a word form or long word form."  (Reply Br. at 9.)                         











Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007