The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 20 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte WAI LEE and TOSHIYUKI SAKUTA ____________ Appeal No. 2001-2593 Application No. 09/074,1971 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before HAIRSTON, KRASS and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 23 and 28. Claims 1-4, 12, 14, 16-22, 26, 27, 29 and 30 are withdrawn from consideration as being draw to a non-elected invention, claims 6, 7, 10, 24 and 25 are allowed and claims 5, 8, 9, 11, 13 and 15 are cancelled. We reverse. 1 Application for patent filed May 7, 1998, which is a divisional of the Application No. 08/426,349, filed April 21, 1995, now U.S. Patent No. 5,818,743.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007