Appeal No. 2002-0508
Application No. 09/225,116
reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the
inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had
possession of the claimed invention” is affirmed.
II. The rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) of appealed
claims 1 and 23 as anticipated by Jeng is reversed.
III. The rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) of appealed
claims 1, 2, and 4 through 7 as anticipated by Yoshimori is
reversed, but the rejection on this same ground of appealed
claims 13, 14, and 16 through 19 is affirmed;
IV. The rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) of appealed
claims 1, 3, 4, 10, and 11 as anticipated by Jost is reversed,
but the rejection on this same ground of appealed claims 13
through 16 is affirmed; and
V. The rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) of appealed
claims 1, 3, 4, 10, and 11 as anticipated by Chou is reversed,
but the rejection on this same ground of appealed claims 13, 14,
and 16 is affirmed.
The decision of the examiner to reject the appealed claims
is affirmed in part.
12
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007