Appeal No. 2002-1876
Application 09/358,158
For the reasons stated above, we conclude that the teachings
of the references are sufficient to establish a prima facie case
of obviousness, which has been rebutted. The rejection of
claims 1-5, 7, and 8 is sustained.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
ERROL A. KRASS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)) BOARD OF PATENT
JERRY SMITH ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
LEE E. BARRETT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
- 10 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007