Appeal No. 2002-2030 Page 4 Application No. 09/294,663 representative sample of the genus and does not provide an adequate written description for the genus.” Id. We agree with the examiner’s reasoning and conclusion. The Federal Circuit provided the appropriate standard in University of California v. Eli Lilly & Co., 119 F.3d 1559, 43 USPQ2d 1398 (Fed. Cir. 1997). The claims in Lilly were directed generically to vertebrate or mammalian insulin cDNAs. See 119 F.3d at 1567, 43 USPQ2d at 1405. The court held that a structural description of a rat cDNA was not an adequate description of these broader classes of cDNAs, because a “written description of an invention involving a chemical genus, like a description of a chemical species, ‘requires a precise definition, such as by structure, formula, [or] chemical name,’ of the claimed subject matter sufficient to distinguish it from other materials.” Id. (bracketed material in original). The Lilly court explained that a generic statement such as . . . ‘mammalian insulin cDNA,’ without more, is not an adequate written description of the genus because it does not distinguish the genus from others, except by function. It does not specifically define any of the genes that fall within its definition. It does not define any structural features commonly possessed by members of the genus that distinguish them from others. One skilled in the art therefore cannot, as one can do with a fully described genus, visualize or recognize the identity of the members of the genus. A definition by function, as we have previously indicated, does not suffice to define the genus because it is only an indication of what the gene does, rather than what it is. Id. at 1568, 43 USPQ2d at 1406. Finally, the Lilly court held that a genus of cDNAs could be described by means of a recitation of a representative number of cDNAs, defined by nucleotide sequence, falling within the scope of the genus or of a recitation of structural features common to thePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007