Appeal No. 2003-0293 Application No. 09/472,197 Page 6 Because the identifiers are used in determining the information to be delivered in a targeted advertisement, the claim recites statutory subject matter. Moreover, we find that the claimed data structure is more than descriptive material such as music, art, literature, photographs and mere arrangements of facts or data that are merely stored so as to be outputted without creating any functional relationship, either as part of the stored data or as part of the computing process performed by the computer. In sum, we find claim 85 to be statutory within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 101. The rejection of claim 85 under 35 U.S.C. § 101 is therefore reversed. We additionally reverse the rejection of claims 86-90 based upon our findings with respect to claim 85. We turn next to the rejection of claims 85-90 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Scroggie in view of the secondary references. We begin with the rejection of claims 85 and 86 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Scroggie in view of Laor. In rejecting claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103, it is incumbent upon the examiner to establish a factual basis to support the legal conclusion of obviousness. See In re Fine, 837 F.2d 1071, 1073, 5 USPQ2d 1596, 1598 (Fed. Cir. 1988). In soPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007