The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte BIN LI
____________
Appeal No. 2003-0854
Application No. 09/640,0301
____________
HEARD: NOVEMBER 5, 2003
____________
Before KRASS, DIXON and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.
SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1-64, which are all of the claims pending in
this application.
We reverse.
BACKGROUND
Appellant’s invention is directed to an automated system
which analyzes investment chart patterns for determining whether
1 Application for patent filed August 16, 2000, which claims the filing
priority benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119 of provisional Application No.
60/149,067, filed August 16, 1999.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007