Appeal No. 2003-0854
Application No. 09/640,030
template is checked (translation, page 7). However, the Examiner
has failed to point to any teachings in Hirotaka, nor do we find
any, that would have taught or suggested the specific claimed
analysis for correlating the investment chart to the retrieved
template, as recited in the claims.
In view of our analysis above, we find that the Examiner has
failed to set forth a prima facie case of obviousness because the
necessary teachings and suggestions related to the claimed
analysis of an investment chart and a stored template to
determine if a pattern exists in the investment chart is not
shown. Accordingly, we do not sustain the 35 U.S.C. § 103
rejection of the claims.
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007