Appeal No. 2003-0868 3
Application No. 09/710,101
THE REFERENCES OF RECORD
As evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies upon the following references:
Williams et al. (Williams) 5,237,193 Aug. 17, 1993
Shekar et al. (Shekar) 5,317,171 May 31, 1994
Mojaradi et al. (Mojaradi) 5,382,826 Jan. 17, 1995
Roth et al. (Roth) 6,153,916 Nov. 28, 2000
Hamza Yilmaz (Yilmaz) “Optimization and Surface Charge Sensitivity of High-Voltage
Blocking Structures With Shallow Junctions” IEEE Transactions of Electron Devices, Vol.
38, No. 7, pp. 1666-1674 (July 1991).
THE REJECTIONS
Claims 1, 3, 5, 8, 9, 11, 13 and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §103(a) as
being unpatentable over Mojaradi in view of Roth.
Claims 4 and 12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §103(a) as being unpatentable
over Mojaradi in view of Roth and further in view of Williams.
Claims 7 and 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §103(a) as being unpatentable
over Mojaradi in view of Roth and further in view of Shekar.
Claims 6 and 14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §103(a) as being unpatentable
over Mojaradi in view of Roth and further in view of Yilmaz.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007