The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 24 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ALBERTO O. ADAN ____________ Appeal No. 2003-0886 Application No. 09/466,845 ____________ HEARD: NOVEMBER 5, 2003 ____________ Before THOMAS, RUGGIERO, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges. LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 16, and 171. Claims 3 and 6-15 have been canceled. BACKGROUND Appellant’s invention relates to a semiconductor device with bit lines formed via diffusion over word lines. An understanding 1 The amendment (Paper No. 12, filed May 28, 2002) submitted subsequent to the final rejection has not been entered by the examiner (Paper No. 13, mailed June 7, 2002).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007