Ex Parte ADAN - Page 6




          Appeal No. 2003-0886                                                        
          Application No. 09/466,845                                 Page 6           


          formed over Hirano's silicide2 film, the heat needed to form the            
          gate insulating film would cause the silicide film to metalize in           
          the form of islands which would degrade the performance of the              
          silicide layer, possibly resulting in short circuiting between              
          the bit lines 44 and the gate electrodes 50.  It is further                 
          argued (brief, page 6) that the examiner's reason for making the            
          modification i.e., to reduce contact resistances, would not                 
          happen due to the metalization of the silicide layer.  It is                
          additionally argued (brief, page 7) that Chen relates to a double           
          density MROM, having bitlines and wordlines.  Appellant asserts             
          (id.) that in MROMS, source and drain electrodes are not needed,            
          and that Hirano is directed to a liquid crystal display (LCD),              
          which requires source drain electrodes.  In Hirano, the                     
          source/drain electrodes are made up of silicide layer 108 and               
          metal layer 109.  Because Chen does not need source/drain                   
          electrodes, there is no need for the silicide layer 108 or metal            
          layer 209 in Chen.                                                          
               From our review of Chen, we find that Chen is directed to a            
          double density MROM (col. 1, lines 1 and 2).  As shown in figure            
          8, substrate 32 has a substantially flat surface.  An insulation            

               2 Appellant and the examiner appear to refer to silicide and salicide  
          interchangeably.  Throughout the Decision, we have used the terms in a manner
          consistent with their usage by the examiner and appellant.                  







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007