Appeal No. 2001-1118
Application 09/262,690
For the above reasons, the rejection of (1) claims 11, 13, 14, 16 and 17 as being
anticipated under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) by Chakravorty, (2) claim 12 as being unpatentable under
35 U.S.C. § 103 over Chakravorty in view of Nakajima, and (3) claims 15 and 18-27 as being
unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Chakravorty in view of Hoshino cannot be sustained.
The examiner’s rejection of claims 11-27 is reversed.
REVERSED
______________________________ )
JAMESON LEE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
______________________________ ) BOARD OF PATENT
SALLY GARDNER LANE ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
______________________________ )
SALLY C. MEDLEY )
Administrative Patent Judge )
cc: Kevin R. Casey, Esq.
RATNER & PRESTIA
One Westlakes, Berwyn
P.O. Box 980
Suite 301
Valley Forge, PA 19482-0980
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007