Appeal No. 2002-0792 Application 08/801,646 We fail to find that the Examiner has shown that Anderson or Polychronopoulos teaches these above limitations. In view of the foregoing, we have not sustained the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1 through 6, 13, 14, 18 through 34, 40 through 46, and 52 through 55 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Anderson in view of Polychronopoulos. REVERSED ERROL A. KRASS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT MICHAEL R. FLEMING ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) JOSEPH L. DIXON ) Administrative Patent Judge ) MRF:pgc 12Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007