Appeal No. 2002-1046
Application 08/861,831
a completely different problem of providing a high voltage, high
frequency metal oxide semiconductor device. We fail to find any
reason why one of ordinary skill in the art would have been led
to make the modification as proposed by the Examiner to
substitute the Cauge high voltage, high frequency metal oxide
semiconductor shown in figure 8 for the balance selection
transistors 53 shown in figure 29 of Matsumoto.
In view of the foregoing, we have not sustained the
Examiner’s rejection of claims 1 through 8 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
REVERSED
JAMES D. THOMAS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
LEE E. BARRETT )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
MICHAEL R. FLEMING )
Administrative Patent Judge )
MRF:pgc
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007