Appeal No. 2002-1474 Page 14
Application No. 09/002,927
synthesis or reconstruction at the proprietary receiver. The
single set of updated data transmitted for local storage,
moreover, is used both for the audio and graphic interpretations
of the information.” Liebesny further discloses (col. 9, lines
47-49) that “[a] keyboard selection KA and Kv, FIG. 6, will still
cause previously recorded information to be played back (either
audibly or visually).” From the disclosure of Liebesny that the
digitally transmitted information is broken down as to graphics,
and that previously stored information will be played back
visually, we find that receivers V of Liebesny receive image
data, and play back the received image data on video receiver V.
Moreover, from the disclosure that the received information is
reconstructed by the receiver (col. 9, lines 39-41) we find that
to be reconstructed as video data, that the data sent to the
receiver was originally video data before it was encoded and
transmitted for reconstruction as image signals.
From all of the above, we find that Liebesny discloses "when
the vehicle information receiving means receives a vehicle
information based on image data, the vehicle information based on
image data is displayed,” as recited in claim 1.
We are not persuaded by appellants assertion (brief, page 7)
that the data received by receiver V is not image data because it
Page: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007