Ex Parte STEWART et al - Page 2



                 Appeal No. 2003-1417                                                         Page 2                   
                 Application No. 09/298,404                                                                            

                        The examiner relies on the following references:                                               
                 Frackelton, Jr. et al. (Frackelton)       4,543,439            Sep. 24, 1985                          
                 Ryan et al. (Ryan)                       4,544,545            Oct.    1, 1985                        
                 Goldenberg                               5,120,525            Jun.    9, 1992                        
                 Staerz et al. (Staerz), “Hybrid hybridoma producing a bispecific monoclonal                           
                 antibody that can focus effector T-cell activity,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,                        
                 Vol. 83, pp. 1453-1457 (1986)                                                                         
                 Bird et al. (Bird), “Single-Chain Antigen-Binding Proteins, Science, Vol. 242,                        
                 pp. 423-426 (1988)                                                                                    
                        Claims 60-73 and 76 stand rejected for obviousness-type double patenting                       
                 over claims 30-39 and 44 of U.S. Patent 6,326,482.                                                    
                        Claims 60-66, 68, 69, and 71-73 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)                        
                 as anticipated by Frackelton.                                                                         
                        Claims 60-66, 68-73, and 76-84 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                         
                 follows:                                                                                              
                        • claims 60-62 and 76 as obvious in view of Frackelton;                                        
                        • claims 60-63, 70, 78, and 81-84 as obvious in view of Frackelton and Bird;                   
                        • claims 60-63 and 77-79 as obvious in view of Frackelton and Staerz                           
                        • claims 60-63 and 80 as obvious in view of Frackelton and Ryan                                
                        • claims 60-63 and 71-73 as obvious in view of Frackelton and Goldenberg.                      
                        We affirm the rejection for obviousness-type double patenting but reverse                      
                 the remaining rejections.                                                                             
                                                     Background                                                        
                        “Interactions between ligands and the cognate cell surface receptors are                       
                 critical for a variety of biological processes. . . .  Many of these ligands can                      
                 activate multiple independent pathways and the strength of the activation of                          






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007