Appeal No. 2003-1417 Page 2 Application No. 09/298,404 The examiner relies on the following references: Frackelton, Jr. et al. (Frackelton) 4,543,439 Sep. 24, 1985 Ryan et al. (Ryan) 4,544,545 Oct. 1, 1985 Goldenberg 5,120,525 Jun. 9, 1992 Staerz et al. (Staerz), “Hybrid hybridoma producing a bispecific monoclonal antibody that can focus effector T-cell activity,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Vol. 83, pp. 1453-1457 (1986) Bird et al. (Bird), “Single-Chain Antigen-Binding Proteins, Science, Vol. 242, pp. 423-426 (1988) Claims 60-73 and 76 stand rejected for obviousness-type double patenting over claims 30-39 and 44 of U.S. Patent 6,326,482. Claims 60-66, 68, 69, and 71-73 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Frackelton. Claims 60-66, 68-73, and 76-84 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as follows: • claims 60-62 and 76 as obvious in view of Frackelton; • claims 60-63, 70, 78, and 81-84 as obvious in view of Frackelton and Bird; • claims 60-63 and 77-79 as obvious in view of Frackelton and Staerz • claims 60-63 and 80 as obvious in view of Frackelton and Ryan • claims 60-63 and 71-73 as obvious in view of Frackelton and Goldenberg. We affirm the rejection for obviousness-type double patenting but reverse the remaining rejections. Background “Interactions between ligands and the cognate cell surface receptors are critical for a variety of biological processes. . . . Many of these ligands can activate multiple independent pathways and the strength of the activation ofPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007