Ex Parte Reynolds - Page 1



          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
          Board.                                                                      
                                                            Paper No. 31              
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                             Ex parte RANDY B. REYNOLDS                               
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2004-0356                                  
                               Application 09/811,993                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      
          Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and McQUADE, Administrative Patent                 
          Judges.                                                                     
          FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                     

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   

          This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                      
          rejection of claims 61 through 67, 69 through 72 and 74.  Claims            
          68 and 73, the only other claims remaining in the application,              
          stand objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim,            
          but have been indicated by the examiner to be allowable if                  
          rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of           
                                          1                                           




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007