Appeal No. 2004-0356
Application 09/811,993
Accordingly, we have not considered any argument pertaining to
such non-entered evidence in reaching our decision in the present
appeal.
In light of the foregoing, the examiner’s rejection of
claims 61 through 67, 69 through 72 and 74 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) will be sustained.
Notwithstanding appellant’s request on page 5 of the brief
that the Board rule separately on the patentability of each
appealed claim, we note that appellant has not presented
arguments directed to any specific claim on appeal and failed to
separately argue the patentability of each of the claims on
appeal. Thus, we have concluded that claims 62 through 67, 69
through 72 and 74 will fall with representative independent claim
61. See, In re Wood, 582 F.2d 638, 642, 199 USPQ 137, 140 (CCPA
1978).
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 61 through 67,
69 through 72 and 74 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) is affirmed.
13
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007