Ex Parte Douin et al - Page 1




                             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                       
                                     for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                               
                                                                                                Paper No. 24                  
                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                           
                                                        __________                                                            
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                            
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                              
                                                        __________                                                            
                                             Ex parte VERONIQUE DOUIN,                                                        
                                                 BENEDICTE CAZIN, and                                                         
                                                 SANDRINE DECOSTER                                                            
                                                        __________                                                            
                                                  Appeal No. 2004-0378                                                        
                                                Application No. 09/765,675                                                    
                                                        __________                                                            
                                                  HEARD July 27, 2004                                                         
                                                        __________                                                            
              Before SCHEINER, ADAMS, and GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judges.                                               
              GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                            

                                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                                           
                      This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final                            
              rejection of claims 1-83, all of the claims in the application.  Claims 1, 17, 20, 23, 64,                      
              and 78 are representative and read as follows:                                                                  
                      1.     An oil-in-water nanoemulsion comprising oil globules with an average size                        
                             of less than 150nm comprising at least one oil, at least one amphiphilic                         
                             lipid, and at least one cationic polymer comprising at least one                                 
                             hydrophobic block and at least one hydrophilic block.                                            
                      17.    A nanoemulsion according to claim 1 wherein said at least one amphiphilic                        
                             lipid is chosen from nonionic amphiphilic lipids and anionic amphiphilic                         
                             lipids.                                                                                          







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007