Ex Parte Douin et al - Page 18


              Appeal No. 2004-0378                                                                                            
              Application No. 09/765,675                                                                                      

              amphiphilic lipid selected from several enumerated types.  Thus, claim 20 reads on the                          
              composition made obvious by Restle and Ziegler, because that composition comprises                              
              an oil, a nonionic amphiphilic lipid (see Ziegler at column 6, lines 15-40; Restle, page 4,                     
              second paragraph), an appropriate cationic polymer, and a cationic amphiphilic lipid                            
              (specifically, a quaternary ammonium functionalized phosphate ester).  Since the prior                          
              art would have made obvious at least one composition within the scope of claim 20, the                          
              claimed composition is unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103.                                                      
                      Again, since our rationale for affirming the rejection of claim 20 differs from that                    
              of the examiner, we designate our affirmance with respect to this rejection as a new                            
              ground of rejection under 37 CFR § 1.196(b).                                                                    
              5.  Claims 64-67                                                                                                
                      The examiner rejected claim 64-67 as obvious in view of the combined teachings                          
              of Restle, Ziegler, Simonnet, Matzik, and Decoster.  Claim 64 is directed to the                                
              nanoemulsion composition of claim 1, further comprising an aminosilicone.4                                      
                      The examiner acknowledge that none of Restle, Ziegler, Simonnet, or Matzik                              
              suggest adding aminosilicone to an oil-in-water nanoemulsion.  The examiner                                     
              characterized Decoster as “teach[ing a] cosmetic detergent composition comprising 0.5-                          
              5 weight % of aminosilicone along with anionic surfactant, amphoteric surfactants and                           
              cationic polymers.”  Paper No. 5, mailed August 16, 2001, page 5.  The examiner                                 
              concluded that “[i]t would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time                    
              the invention was made to have modified the composition of the combined references                              
                                                                                                                              
              4 According to the specification, “the term at least one ‘aminosilicone’ means any silicone comprising at       
              least one amine chosen from primary, secondary, and tertiary amines or at least one quaternary                  
              ammonium group.”  Page 36.  In addition, the terms “‘silicone’ and ‘polysiloxane’ are synonymous.”  Id.         





Page:  Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007