Ex Parte Wong - Page 1




           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written 
                  for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.          
                                                            Paper No. 25              

                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                           
                                     __________                                       
                      BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                              
                                AND INTERFERENCES                                     
                                      __________                                      
                               Ex parte TING-WAH WONG                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                Appeal No. 2004-0607                                  
                             Application No. 09/792,848                               
                                     __________                                       
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                      __________                                      
          Before OWENS, KRATZ, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                
          OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 23-29.               
          Claims 1-10, which are all of the other claims pending in the               
          application, stand withdrawn from consideration by the examiner             
          as being directed toward a nonelected invention.                            
                                    THE INVENTION                                     
               The appellants claim an integrated circuit comprising a                
          substrate having therein first and second triple wells, the first           
          of which has thereover a logic circuit element and the second of            
          which has thereover a radio frequency element.  Claim 23 is                 
          illustrative:                                                               
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007