Appeal No. 2004-0607
Application No. 09/792,848
For this reason and because the examiner has not provided
evidence or reasoning which shows that one of ordinary skill in
the art would have modified Momohara’s integrated circuit such
that the P-well is biased with a bias potential above Vss, the
examiner has not carried the burden of establishing a prima facie
case of obviousness of the appellant’s claimed integrated
circuit. Accordingly, we reverse the rejections of claims 23-29
under 35 U.S.C. § 103.5
5 The examiner does not rely upon Zhu for any disclosure
that remedies the above-discussed deficiency in Momohara.
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007