Appeal No. 2004-1123 Application No. 09/933,503 OPINION In reaching our decision in this appeal, we have given careful consideration to appellants' specification and claims, to the applied prior art references, and to the respective positions articulated by appellant and the examiner. As a consequence of our review, we have made the determination which follows. In considering the examiner's rejection of claims 10 through 20 under § 103(a), we note that the "Background of the Invention" portion of appellants' specification informs us that in the field of semiconductor fabrication it has become desirable to operate in an extremely high cleanliness minienvironment that eliminates micro-contamination and reduces native oxide growth on silicon surfaces. Figure 1 of the application is designated "Prior Art" and schematically shows such a high cleanliness minienvironment (10). Semiconductor wafers to be processed are transported into the high cleanliness minienvironment via a standard mechanical interface apparatus (SMIF) located at a loading and unloading section (14). More particularly, a cassette (30) of wafers is transported into the high cleanliness minienvironment from a SMIF pod (18) situated on top of the SMIF apparatus (20). 33Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007