Interference No. 104,833
Page No. 5
Claim correspondence
10. All of the Hazes claims and all of the Bries claims correspond to either Count 1 or
Count 2.
11. Hazes claims 1-10 and Bries claims 68-77 correspond to Count I (Paper 9 at 2).
12. Hazes claims 11-13 and Bries claims 78-81 correspond to Count 2 (Paper 9 at 2).
Hazes motions
13. Hazes filed the following eight preliminary motions:
(a) Hazes preliminary motion I under 3 7 CFR 1. 63 3 (a) for j udgment that all
of Bries claims are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 112, T I for lack of written description (Paper
33).
(b) Hazes preliminary motion 2 under 37 CFR 1.633(f) seeking priority
benefit of German patent application DE 197 26 375, filed 21 June 1997 (Paper 34).
(c) Hazes preliminary motion 3 under 37 CFR 1.633(h) seeking to add reissue
10/192,146, filed 10 July 2002, to the interference (Paper 35).
(d) Hazes contingent preliminary motion 4 under 37 CFR 1.633(f) seeking
priority benefit of German patent application DE 197 26 375, filed 21 June 1997, as to the
reissue application, if added (Paper 36).
(e) Hazes preliminary motion 5 under 37 CFR 1.633(c)(1) to substitute count
3 or count 4 2 for counts I and 2 (Paper 37).
2 Hazes wishes to substitute count 4 only if its motion to add the reissue application
is granted (Paper 37 at 2).
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007